Monday, September 23, 2013

Vengeance versus Custaunce




But shortly, from the castel on a night
The lords steward – God yeve him meschaunce! –
A theef that hadde reneyed our creunce,
Cam into ship alone and seide he sholde
Hir lemman be, wherso she wolde or nolde.

Wo was this wrecched woman tho bigon;
Hir child cride, and she cride pitously.
But blissful Marye help hire right anon;
For with hir strogeling wel and mightily
The theef fil overbord al sodeinly,
And in the see he dreinte for vengeaunce.
And thus has Crist unwemmed kept Custaunce.
“The Man of Law’s Tale” (913-924)

What originally attracted me to this passage was a note about it on p. 874 that said that Chaucer was unique in having Custaunce successfully fight back and save herself. I wondered why he differed from Trivet and Gower.

My first thoughts were to compare her to the other women we’ve met. Custaunce is the opposite of Alisoun—I believe she’s meant to be.  Emelye, like Custaunce, marries whoever she is told to marry. However, we don’t see Emelye after she leaves Diane’s care. Custaunce is now a mother. Unlike the mother in “The Reeve’s Tale”, Custaunce fights back to protect herself and her child. I particularly notice the fighting of the miller’s wife in “The Reeve’s Tale.” The miller’s wife actually hurts her husband, where Custaunce saves herself.

I also think about boats and water. You could say there are three rudderless boats in “The Miller’s Tale.” But while Alisoun, Nicholas, and John all say they are trusting to God’s guidance, Alisoun and Nicholas are lying, and John fails by falling asleep. I think there are also some echoes in “The Reeve’s Tale.” The characters may not be lost at sea, but it is so dark they cannot see where they are. For some reason the cradle makes me think of a rudderless boat as well. There are so many stories of babies being put to sea in cradles, boxes, etc. But unlike the miller’s wife, who doesn’t know where she is and just follows the cradle, Custaunce may be lost at sea but she knows who and where she is in terms of the boat and her values.

I find it harder to catch the wordplay Chaucer uses. However, these are the things I think I notice. There are three words emphasizing speed, “shortly,” “right anon,” and “sodeinly.” I also think the phrase “wolde or nolde” adds to the sense of speed. There is some use of alliteration. “Creance” connects with “cam” emphasizing that the thief who is coming has renounced his faith. “Wo was this wrecched woman” goes together to musically connect the words and emphasize Custaunce’s unhappy state. The repetition of “cride” in the next line highlights the unhappiness and leads the reader to expect helplessness (a helpless woman crying). It also is a line that forces the reader to take a noticeable pause after the first “cride.” This contrasts well with the iambic beat of the next line. The ending words of the last two lines, “vengeaunce” and “Custaunce” are what this story is all about. I am assuming “custaunce” means “constance” (which I can’t verify by MED, OED, or our book). “The Knight’s Tale” is about, among other things, constancy and what happens when constancy in keeping oaths is broken. All the tales since then have been tellers trying to get vengeance on the previous speaker. Now the man of law is bringing the listeners away from vengeance back to the appreciation of virtues. Go figure, a lawyer speaking for virtue.


WORKS CITED
Chaucer, Geoffrey. The Canterbury Tales. Ed. Jill Mann. London: Penguin, 2005. Print.

OED Online. September 2013. Oxford University Press. 23 September 2013

3 comments:

  1. It’s interesting that you point out the juxtaposition of constancy and vengeance. I’d agree with your assortment that the tales we have read so far rely heavily on one of the two, this tale and the Reeve’s Tale especially. It is also interesting that both play a significant part in this tale. Custaunce is certainly a constantly virtuous character, but she is surrounded by people who seem to act on impulse, which comes out as vengeance most of the time. Both mother-in-laws could be said to exact vengeance, and even King Alla takes revenge out on his mother for what she did to Custaunce. The passage you brought in is the only time Custaunce comes anywhere near avenging herself; and still Chaucer lets her exercise her trust in God and the situation takes care of itself. I’ve been thinking that she tossed the thief off the boat, but actually “The theef fil overbord al sodeinly.” The phrasing places the blame on him not her. It brings to mind that phrase God uses in the Bible “Vengeance is Mine. I will repay.” So do you think that this is a commentary on vengeance itself or rather on who takes vengeance? At the moment I’m leaning toward the latter.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wish I had read this earlier. I'd love to keep talking with you about it.

    I still think that Custaunce is the cause of the thief falling overboard. It is because of her struggling--not an intentional act but the result of her act nonetheless. I think it comes down to the meaning of "with." Does "with" mean at the same time as, or through the action of? Both are possible according to the MED. Let's say that Custaunce's struggle did cause the thief to fall overboard. It would be an act of self-preservation, not vengeance. So maybe the commentary is between what one needs to do to survive/get justice versus trying to get revenge. I'm thinking of the WOB's tale, where justice or redemption is chosen instead of vengeance.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wish I had read this earlier. I'd love to keep talking with you about it.

    I still think that Custaunce is the cause of the thief falling overboard. It is because of her struggling--not an intentional act but the result of her act nonetheless. I think it comes down to the meaning of "with." Does "with" mean at the same time as, or through the action of? Both are possible according to the MED. Let's say that Custaunce's struggle did cause the thief to fall overboard. It would be an act of self-preservation, not vengeance. So maybe the commentary is between what one needs to do to survive/get justice versus trying to get revenge. I'm thinking of the WOB's tale, where justice or redemption is chosen instead of vengeance.

    ReplyDelete