Thursday, September 12, 2013

Lions, Tigers, and Prayers.


Lions, Tigers, and Prayers.

            I was thinking back on the Knight’s Tale and something Meg pointed out to me. It was that as Palamon and Arcite fight in the forest glade they are compared to animals. I could make statements about representing ferocity or the fact that animals were used all the time in heraldry (well actually I do want to talk about heraldry but not yet) that pertain to that passage, but what I realized that the two knight keep those descriptions. Both in the forest and in the arena Palamon is a “wood leon” (1656 and 2629-2632) and Arcite is always “cruel tigre” (1657 and 2626-2629). Actually here are the two passages.

            Thou mightiest wene that this Palamoun

            In his fighting were a wood leon,

            And as a cruel tigre was Arcite. (1655-1657)

 

And then the arena.

            Ther nas no tigre in the vale of Galgopheye,

            Whan that hir whelp is stole whan is lite,

            So crule on the hunte as is Arcite,

            For jalous herte, upon this Palamoun;

            N’in Belmarye ther nis so fel leon,

            That hunted is, or for his hunger wood,

            Ne of his praye desireth so the blood

            As Palamon to sleen his foo Arcite. (2626-2633).

Now certainly the last description is more elaborate than the first, but it is the same comparison. I think I am willing to attribute to Chaucer enough skill that he could have come up with something else if he really wanted to. Or if we want to stick with the idea that this story is in character of the knight, I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and thousands of lines of poetry and say that he could have thought of something else too. So, it seems that this is deliberate consistency and might say something about the character of both.

            Palamon is the mad, it would seem both angry and crazy (wood and desireth so the blood) lion. In heraldry the lion is a beast of nobility and kings. Then to make it crazy creates a blunt, straightforward, but unstoppable force. This seems to be exactly who Palamon is. We know he was quite angry about Arcite’s confession of love in the tower. We also know he is as brutally honest as a cudgel because he turned himself and Arcite in as soon as Theseus asked. This would explain his application to Venus. Love is what he wants so love is what he asks.

            Arcite is the tiger. I don’t know a whole lot about the tiger in heraldry but in this description he is a “cruel tigre.” And not only cruel but cruel “For jalous herte” (2629). The term cruel in combination with “hunt” seems to imply some amount of cunning. This is also a perfect description of character. As he dies Arcite confesses that he fought with his cousin for “jalousye” (2784-2785). He also seems to exhibit a certain amount of conniving. He sneaks into Theseus household, argues his way out of bonds of brotherhood, and I think prays to mars because of it. He thinks that an application to love will be vain because it’s the victor who weds Emelye. So, in an effort to cheat the system he pleads to the god of war.

There, that’s me going on and on. I’m sorry there is no audio visual to go with this. I can only present this awesome illustration of sir Gawain and the Green Knight that Meg and I couldn’t work into our presentation.

 

And God save al this faire compaignye!
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight by John Howe.
From the poem:
The green knight got ready, feet firm on the ground;leaned his head a little to let the cheek show,and raised the rich riot of his hairso the nape of his neck was naked and exposed.Gawain held the ax high overhead,his left foot set before him on the floor,swung swiftly at the soft fleshso the bit of the blade broke through the bones,crashed through the clear fat and cut it in two,and the brightly burnished edge bit into the earth.The handsome head fell, hit the ground,and rolled forward; they fended it off with their feet.The red blood burst bright from the green body,yet the fellow neither faltered nor fellbut stepped strongly out on sturdy thighs,reached roughly right through their legs,grabbed his graceful head and lifted it from the ground,ran to his horse, caught hold of the reins,stepped in the stirrup, strode into the saddle,the head dangling by the hair from his hand,and seated himself as firmly in the saddleas if he were unhurt, though he sat on his horse withouta head.                He swiveled his bulk about;                the ugly stump still bled.                They gaped in fear and doubt                because of the words he said.
 

 

1 comment:

  1. So, looking things up in MED (which didn't turn up anything) and the OED, here are some thoughts (both definitions are from the OED):

    lion, n.
    ...It is very powerful, and has a noble and impressive appearance; whence it is sometimes called ‘the king of beasts’.

    tiger, n.
    ... proverbial for its ferocity and cunning.

    These definitions are from the right time period and seem to support your ideas. But as I was looking them up, I started wondering about the biblical connections to lions, which I think you would know better than me. As I recall lions can represent both good and bad things. (or am I just remembering lions eating Christians?) I absolutely agree with you that Chaucer isn't making a comparison at random, he controls all his language too well.

    ReplyDelete