The quote that was discussed in class to show that the
knight very well could have learned his lesson is,
But ate
laste he seide in this manere;/
‘My lady
and my love, and wif so deere,/
I putte me in youre wise
governaunce/
Cheseth yourself which maybe moost
plesaunce,/
And moost honour to yow and me
also./
I do no fors the weither of the
two,/
For as yow liketh, it suffiseth
me.’ (1228-1235)
I understand how this could show his redemption. The way he
describes his wife on different levels as “lady”, “love”, and “wif” shows her
in different roles in his life (1229). I understand that it is a change for him
to tell her to decide what she wants first, and he will follow. I understand
that he is finally, putting her first, above him, in his speech, and has
reflected on his response (1228) rather that just responding. It is clear that
there is an emotional and moral growth that takes place. However, I do not like
him.
To begin with the knight committed a terrible crime, when he
raped the woman (889). His crime is terrible, but I believe that the punishment
that the queen sentences him to is almost crueler in a way, than being
executed, and it is well deserved. He has to search out women to learn about
them, a punishment he would find demeaning. I say good. The knight’s actions
were monstrous and demeaning to women, shouldn’t he be put in position where he
feel humiliated?
When he finally gets the answer to the queen’s question, and
the old womea asks that she marries him, he behaves horribly towards her. This
woman just saved his life, and he’s going to behave by saying, “‘My love!’ quod
he, ‘nay my dampnacioun!’ (1067). What this also makes me think is that
everything the knight learned on his quest meant nothing to him. He was going
through the motions, to get the answer, but had no interest from learning from
the experience.
To wrap up, on why I do not like the knight, his resolution
seemed to happen too easily for his actions and behavior. Because he made this
statement to her about how he will put her first, she then is willing to become
beautiful. How do we know that he means that long term? His behavior and views
towards women were demeaning and abusive, but he gets to have a happy ending. I
find it hard to find the justice for the girl he raped or the way he treated
his wife because in the end, his wife changed for him, and he gets to live with
a beautiful spouse, who is a reflection of a short declaration of granting
power.
This was a fantastic post, Heather!! I loved absolutely everything you said and I completely agree, I do not like the Knight in the slightest. I felt the same way about his redemption - it was way too quick of a change and there'e no evidence to suggest that he will keep true to his word for the long term (although, as I typed that I realized he did stay true to his word and marry the woman so who knows, maybe we are supposed to believe he will be truly different from now on).
ReplyDeleteI really liked what you had to say about the fact that, in the end, his wife did change for him. I hadn't considered it in that way before, or maybe I just didn't pay enough attention to this idea, but either way I really liked your point. Basically I just really loved your entire post, in case you can't already tell, so thanks so much for sharing your thoughts because I had a great time reading them!!