http://fc04.deviantart.net/fs15/f/2007/111/a/c/ Why_The_Caged_Bird_Sings_by_jesidangerously.jpg |
Not that it needs to be said, but I do not condone the wife cheating on Phebus, but I think that it is interesting that the Manciple compared her desires to an animal's. After the discussion we had on "The Nun's Priest's Tale" the other week about how in medieval times animals were thought to have no soul, it was interesting to me that this tale made the implication that humans have no more control over their behavior than animals. The Manciple describes Phebus' wife like being a caged bird or a house cat, owned and living outside of her nature.
Comparing wives to a caged bird or house cat is statement that says when men control the wives, the women are no different than a kept animal, and eventually they will act out their true nature no matter how well they are loved or treated, like the cat who drinks milk, but then sees a mouse (175-177). The control does not stop the act, the wife will just look for another way. We have seen this in "The Miller's Tale" with John and Alison's marriage and "The Merchant's Wife" like January and May. The wives in these stories like Phebus' wife find ways to have their affairs regardless of the control and jealousy the husband had.
First off, that is an awesome, surrealistic picture, and it fits the topic in a weird way. Now on to the post. I had not thought that the Manciple might be implying that when people try to control one another they reduce them to something like a soulless animal; I took it that the Manciple is saying that such control is pointless because it won’t help anyway. It’s an interesting perspective you present. On the flip side, there are character’s like Griselda and Custaunce who can’t seem to go wrong. Do you think the Manciple is arguing for inherent good and evil?
ReplyDelete